Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Concurrence
Justice Beeyee, with whom Justice O’Connoe joins,.
concurring.
This ease focuses upon a worker who received a payment from her employer and in return promised not to bring an age-discrimination suit. Her promise failed the procedural tests of validity set forth in the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA), 29 U. S. C. § 626(f)(1). I agree with the majority that, because of this procedural failing, the worker is free to bring her age-discrimination suit without “tendering back” her employer’s payment as a precondition. As a conceptual matter, a “tender back” requirement would imply that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koshka v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Miller v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Gilmore v. Western Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919