Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 26, 1998No. 96-1291Published

1Concurrence

Justice Beeyee, with whom Justice O’Connoe joins,.

concurring.

This ease focuses upon a worker who received a payment from her employer and in return promised not to bring an age-discrimination suit. Her promise failed the procedural tests of validity set forth in the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA), 29 U. S. C. § 626(f)(1). I agree with the majority that, because of this procedural failing, the worker is free to bring her age-discrimination suit without “tendering back” her employer’s payment as a precondition. As a conceptual matter, a “tender back” requirement would imply that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koshka v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. Miller v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gilmore v. Western Electric Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API