King v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Dissent
Dissenting opinion by
Justice STUMBO.
Respectfully, I dissent from the majority opinion because I believe Appellant should be entitled to a new trial due to the trial court’s failure to exclude the out-of-court and in-court identification of Appellant made by witness Karen Ross (cashier # 3).
First, I believe that the photo array shown to witnesses Ross and Devonda Carnes (cashier #2) was unduly suggestive. Most all descriptions of the suspect indicated that he was a black man in his mid to late thirties, approximately six feet tall, wearing eyeglasses and a blue and white jacket. Ross’s prior…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wilson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- United States v. John H. L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.