Legal Opinion
Kligman v. Wilfred Company of Newark, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 18, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Plaintiff recovered judgment upon a verdict against Wilfred Company of Newark, Inc. (hereafter Wilfred) for injury sustained as a result of a “permanent wave” treatment, and Wilfred appeals.
In Hewitt v. Hollaban, 56 N. J. Super. 372, 377 (App. Div. 1959) we said:
“From time to time we have been compelled to point out that imprecise pleadings often lead to error. Cf. State v. Arbus, 54 N. J. Super. 76 (App. Div. 1959); Board of Education, Woodbridge Tp. v. Kane Acoustical Co., 51 N. J. Super. 319 (App. Div. 1958). The reason for this must be fairly obvious. A vague complaint, full of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. Garford Laboratories, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1939
- Miller v. Garford Laboratories, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Wall v. GillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gilborges v. WallaceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977