Legal Opinion

Liliopoulos v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1915No. 12386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered June 25, 1914, upon the verdiet of a jury rendered in favor the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In the early part of April, 1913, the appellant railway company employed the respondent to work as a laborer in an extra force or “gang” of men engaged in grading and repairing the appellant’s line of railway near Enaville, in the state of Idaho. The respondent was to receive $1.75 per day for his services, from which there was to be deducted fifty cents per month for the appellant’s hospital fund. The respondent was a Greek, as were the others of the force of men with whom he labored, and as was the foreman who directed his labor and by whom he was employed. April 27, 1913, was known as the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dudley v. DuvalWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Irby v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. South Tacoma Fuel & Transfer Co. v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Van Doren Roofing & Cornice Co. v. Guardian Casualty & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. MaxwellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. MaxwellAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API