Legal Opinion

Joseph P. Glimco and Lena Glimco v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 9, 1968No. 16469_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

In the Tax Court, Joseph P. Glimco (“Taxpayer”) filed a petition for a redetermination of deficiencies asserted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for the taxable years 1954 through 1957. 1 On the three issues involved here, the Tax Court decided in favor of the Commissioner. Those issues are (1) do the legal fees and expenses, totaling approximately $125,000, paid by Teamsters Local 777 to defendant Taxpayer in a Hobbs Act prosecution, constitute income to Taxpayer or are they deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses; (2) whether his cost basis for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wichita Term. El. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Commissioner v. TellierSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Shaw v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Peter Vaira and Mary L. Vaira v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  2. O'Malley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Anthony J. Accardo and Clarice Accardo v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Richard E. Busch Jr. & Jean N. Busch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Michael v. Frierdich and Connie J. Frierdich v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API