Legal Opinion

McKeesport Tin Plate Co. v. Heiner

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 24, 1933No. Nos. 6142, 6143Published

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

On July 3, 1933, judgment for the defendant was ordered in each of the above eases. Later counsel for the plaintiff moved for a new trial, and the eases have been reargued. Exhaustive briefs have been submitted by counsel, and we have endeavored to carefully review the matters involved.

Counsel for the plaintiff take special exception to the following excerpt from the opinion: “As stated, Congress has given the Commissioner great power in the matter of amortization, and, since originally conferring that power, has taken no action to curb or confine it. For ten years the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Briggs Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API