Legal Opinion

People v. Brinkman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1956PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

At least twelve of the Grand Jurors, who voted to indict, heard all essential and critical evidence including the testimony of the defendant. Based on such evidence the Grand Jury was privileged to return an indictment, since it was sufficient if unexplained or uncontradicted to warrant a conviction by a trial jury (Code Crim. Pro., § 258). The only testimony not heard by at least twelve of the jurors was of an incriminating *976nature but was not necessary to the finding of the indictment as it was merely repetitious.

The order should be affirmed.

Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Fuld, Fboessel, Van…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. SapersteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. PastorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. People v. CollierNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API