Legal Opinion

United States v. Cain

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 17, 2018No. 16-3950-crUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

16-3950-cr United States v. Cain UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Betterman v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. United States v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. TiganoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. PennickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API