Csicsics v. Hallay
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchirick, J.
The plaintiffs have brought this action against the defendants Hallay, alleging continuous trespass upon their property. Defendants Hallay have interposed a counterclaim against the defendant Jocelyn, by service of their answer upon her, alleging that Jocelyn and her testator had conveyed the property in question to them by warranty deed, containing a warranty of quiet enjoyment. Defendants Hallay assert in their counterclaim that if the plaintiff recovers judgment in this action against them this covenant will be thereby breached, in which event defendants Hallay seek judgment over against…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kelvin Engineering Co. v. KnottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Walker v. ManNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Jacrov Amusement Co. v. FischelNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Stokes v. Ottoman American Development Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Stokes v. Ottoman American Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- F. Garofalo Electric Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992