Legal Opinion

Colonial Penn Insurance v. Allstate Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 30, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

O’BRIEN, J.A.D.

At issue in this case is the effect of the adoption of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 upon N.J.S.A. 39.-6A-11, as to contribution among insurers for PIP benefits paid to an insured. The trial judge ruled that N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 had prospective application only and did not become operative until the day after the accident causing the injuries for which the PIP benefits were paid. Therefore, he ruled that both insurers were required to share on an equitable pro rata basis benefits paid, pursuant to N.J. S.A. 39:6A-11. We agree and affirm.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cokenakes v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Darel v. Pennsylvania Manufacturer's InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API