Legal Opinion

National Park Bank v. City of Marietta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 25, 1922No. 13671, 13672PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bboyles, O. J.

1. Where a city, by executing its promissory note for a certain amount of money (not to supply a casual deficiency in its revenue), incurs a-debt without any provision therefor having been made (constitution of Georgia, art. 7, sec. 10, par. 1; Civil Code of 1910, § 6567); and where, by executing such a note, the city creates a debt (not for the purpose of supplying a casual deficiency in its revenue) greater than it had constitutional authority to make without the assent of two thirds of its qualified voters (constitution, art. 7, see. 7, par. 1), the city, when sued upon the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Butts County v. Jackson Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Epping v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Renfroe v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. McCord v. City of JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Town of Wadley v. LancasterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Staub v. City of BaxleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API