Legal Opinion

Lane v. Security Mutual Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Andrew V. Siracuse, J.

The plaintiff in this case is seeking a declaratory judgment that she is entitled to coverage under the fire insurance policy written by defendant. The incident giving rise to the claim was *617a fire set by her 17-year-old. son. It is uncontested that the son’s conduct was the cause of the fire, and it is also uncontested that the plaintiff had no knowledge of the arson and bears no responsibility for it.

The policy at issue excludes coverage for intentional acts by “an insured”, and defines “insured” to include relatives who are resident in the named…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. MugaveroNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Watson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Allstate Insurance v. RoelfsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1987
  4. Reed v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Ponder v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Icenhour v. Continental InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2004
  2. Lane v. Security Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. S.T.A. Parking Corp. v. General Star Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API