Legal Opinion

Hippolyte v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 28, 2001No. 4D00-708Published

1Per curiam

We accept the state’s concession that it was error to enter equal concurrent sentences under both the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act and the habitual felony offender statutes. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000). We therefore strike the habitual offender designa*942tion. See Green v. State, 782 So.2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Conviction affirmed; prison releasee reoffender sentence affirmed; habitual offender designation stricken.

WARNER, C.J., DELL and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001