Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commissioner of Insurance v. Lloyds Insurance Co. of America, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1939No. Docket No. 106, Calendar No. 40,220Published

1DissentButzel, C. J.

I am not in accord with the foregoing opinions. In addition to the facts therein set forth, it should he státed that with the appointment of the Michigan receiver for Lloyds, August 16,1933, “to assist” the New York liquidator “in the liquidation of defendant company,” an injunction was issued “restraining any and all persons from bringing or further prosecuting any action at law or suit in equity” against the company.

On June 5, 1934, the bank secured an order modifying this injunction to enable it to prosecute to judgment its original action on the fidelity bonds. Such suit was then pending…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. HamSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Grenell v. Detroit Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Baldwin v. HosmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lamkin v. Baldwin & Lamkin Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API