Legal Opinion

People v. Cheatham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1990PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant, who had no prior criminal record, testified at trial and denied commission of each of the crimes. On cross-examination he was questioned extensively about drug use and drug transactions by several members of his family. Specifically, defendant was questioned about his father’s possession and daily use of cocaine, and his observations of a cousin wrapping and packaging cocaine. Defendant was also asked if he ever saw his brother and uncles in possession of cocaine, and whether he witnessed sales of cocaine by them to an undercover officer. Much of the cross-examination proceeded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. SchwartzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. SorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. People v. DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. La Beau v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. NusbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. HICKS, AARON, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API