Mandeville v. Courtwright
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
At Law. On motion by defendant for verdict notwithstanding the verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
The Alba Dentists Company was duly incorporated under the law of New Jersey. It practiced dentistry in Pennsylvania. The plaintiff insists that it had no right to do this, because (as she contends) its charter did not authorize it, and the Pennsylvania statute of July 9, 1897 (P. L. 206), prohibited it. Neither of these contentions is unquestionably correct. As to the first, see Lindsay & Phelps Co. v. Mullen, 176 U. S. 136, 20 Sup. Ct. 325, 44 L. Ed. 400; Malone v. Lancaster Co., 182 Pa. 309, 37 Atl. 932; Moxie Co. v. Baumbach (C. C.) 32 Fed. 209. As to the second, see…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Merrick v. . Van SantvoordNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Christian Union v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Linkhauf v. . LombardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Bigelow v. GregoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Vredenburg v. BehanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.