Lawyer v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
Plaintiff seeks recovery of back pay on the ground that her separation from Government service was procedurally defective and that the actions of the administrators were arbitrary, capricious, and “imputed bad faith.”
The pleadings and exhibits on file disclose the following:
Plaintiff was employed by the Public Health Service in Washington, D.C., as a stenographic clerk on January 2, 1957. The appointment was subject to a one year’s probationary period. The plaintiff was found to be physically qualified on a contingent basis.
On March 1, 1957, plaintiff was given a health…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eclov v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Ray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
3Cited by5 opinions
- James E. Haynes v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Greenway v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Powers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Dargo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981