Legal Opinion

Harbert v. Neill Bros.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1878PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. A. P. McCormick. This was a trial of the right of. property under the statute, in thirty-two bales of cotton which bad been shipped by Stephen Harbert to his factors, A. Sessums, Powell & Co., at Galveston.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. A. P. McCormick. This was a trial of the right of. property under the statute, in thirty-two bales of cotton which bad been shipped by Stephen Harbert to his factors, A. Sessums, Powell & Co., at Galveston. After the death of Sessums, and insolvency of the firm, Harbert brought suit by sequestration for the thirty-two bales of cotton against “ The Southern Cotton Press and Manufacturing Company,” in whose warehouse it was stored. The cotton was seized by the sheriff; and February 14,1878, Charles M. Todd and Henry M. Neill, partners, under…

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Associate Justice.

On the 4th day of November, 1872, appellees, Neill Bros. & Co., through their brokers, Richards & Hawkins, entered into an executory contract with A. Sessums, Powell & Co., cotton factors in the city of Galveston, for the purchase of four hundred and fifty bales of cotton, “ on a basis ” of 15J cents per pound for good ordinary cotton. No specific cotton, however, was designated or identified as the subject of this sale; and it was not shown *154on the trial of this case that the thirty-two bales of cotton in .controversy in this suit were then either in the possession…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartt v. Yturria Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Peter NeylonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Qunicy K.A. Sintim and Shirley H. Mills N/K/A Shirley H. Sintim v. Michele Larson and Brian Larson, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API