Legal Opinion
People v. Caguana
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 26, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*954“[S]ince the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which thereafter was actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive” (People v Schnoor, 63 AD3d 760 [2009]; see People v Prude, 62 AD3d 914 [2009]; People v De Alvarez, 59 AD3d 732 [2009]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]).
In any event, the sentence was not excessive, and there is nothing in the record which would warrant disturbing the sentence (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Fisher, J.E, Santucci, Dickerson, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. SchnoorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. PrudeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Bacchus (Latoya)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- People v. Black (Bernard)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- People v. Colin (Samuel)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- People v. Hernandez (Romel)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
- People v. Onyeukwu (Bruno)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.