Legal Opinion
Scott v. Longtin
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 5, 1922No. 1496PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Commissioner of Patents. Interference proceeding between Robert W. Scott and William J. Rongtin and others. From a decision of the Patent Office, to the effect that Scott was not the prior inventor, Scott appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in an interference proceeding, to the effect that the party Scott is not the prior inventor. The interference relates to circular knitting machines, and the single count, which originated with Scott, reads as follows:
“A knitting machine having a series of needles, a body yarn guide, a stitch cam, in combination with means acting on the needles between passages of the stitch cam to isolate one or more needles from the other needles, an auxiliary yarn feed guide adapted to feed an additional yarn to said…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Deibel v. Heise & SchumacherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Humiston v. VoorheesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- Donna L. Jones (Kratz), of the Estate of James J. Jones, Deceased v. Arthur E. KuprionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- Holslag v. HollupCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923