Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 26, 2000No. 4D00-163PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR CLARIFICATION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying appellant’s rule 3.800 mo*84tion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm, as his sentence is not illegal.

In 1989, Bell was charged with first degree murder with a firearm, armed robbery, and an unidentified third charge. He pled guilty to reduced charges of second degree murder and robbery. In exchange for this plea, the state nol prossed the third charge and disregarded Bell’s use of a firearm while engaged in the offenses. Notwithstanding Bell’s sentencing guidelines range of 12-17 years, he…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cheney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Hewitt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buckins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API