Legal Opinion

Pisciotta v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend the remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following: “ Upon this appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question of the interpretation of a Federal Statute, namely, the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 510 et seq.). This Court held that the federal statute did not supersede or suspend the provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, Section 93C-2.0.” [See 300 N. Y. 664.]

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pisciotta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Lupo v. Board of TransportationNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Leidman v. BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Pisciotta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Abramson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API