Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hutchison v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 2017No. Court of Appeals 16CA1375Published

1Concurrence

JUDGE BERGER,

specially concurring.

¶ 36 I join the court’s opinion. I write separately only to address my concerns regarding apportionment of liability attributable to a claimant’s genetic predisposition to a disease when the genetic predisposition has not actually resulted in the disease.1

¶ 37 The majority correctly observes that apportionment is permissible under some .circumstances. See, e.g., § 8-42-104(3), C.R.S. 2016.2 An employer is statutorily responsible only for injuries and disabilities caused by work injury or industrial exposure. Anderson v. Brinkhoff, 859 P.2d 819, 823…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bond v. Rose Ribbon & Carbon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Anderson v. BrinkhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Cowin & Co. v. MedinaColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Newberg v. Armour Food Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API