Hutchison v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
JUDGE BERGER,
specially concurring.
¶ 36 I join the court’s opinion. I write separately only to address my concerns regarding apportionment of liability attributable to a claimant’s genetic predisposition to a disease when the genetic predisposition has not actually resulted in the disease.1
¶ 37 The majority correctly observes that apportionment is permissible under some .circumstances. See, e.g., § 8-42-104(3), C.R.S. 2016.2 An employer is statutorily responsible only for injuries and disabilities caused by work injury or industrial exposure. Anderson v. Brinkhoff, 859 P.2d 819, 823…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bond v. Rose Ribbon & Carbon Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Anderson v. BrinkhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Cowin & Co. v. MedinaColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Newberg v. Armour Food Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992