Legal Opinion
In re Rosie B.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 6, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly sustained a petition charging respondent with sexual abuse based upon respondent’s conviction of first degree rape in a criminal proceeding in County Court involving the same incident which was the subject matter of the petition (see, S. T. Grand, Inc. v City of New York, 32 NY2d 300; Ando v Woodberry, 8 NY2d 165; Matter of Princess CC., 120 AD2d 917, 918). Neither County Court nor the prosecutor had authority to assure respondent that his plea was in full satisfaction of the petition pending…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- S. T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ando v.WoodberryNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- In re Princess CC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Suffolk County Department of Social Services v. James M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992