Legal Opinion
Claim of Yanarella v. IBM Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 16, *6211991, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant did not have a total industrial disability.
Claimant worked for the employer as a computer programmer in a manufacturing area where she was exposed to various chemicals. Claimant alleged that she suffered from "multiple chemical sensitivities” and sought a classification of total industrial disability. The medical examiner for the Workers’ Compensation Board determined that claimant was only permanently partially disabled. In addition, a report from Upstate Rehabilitation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Di Leonardo v. Heathcote Fish MarketAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Claim of Grandinetti v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Claim of Spangenberg v. View Point Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Claim of Martinez v. FicanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- Claim of Majewski v. Iroquois Millwork Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Ronda v. Edenwald ContractingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Claim of Sacco v. Mast Advertising/PublishingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Newman v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Gaff v. North Star TruckingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Claim of Mastan v. Nashua Tape ProductsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995