Legal Opinion
Constantopoulos v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 31, 1966No. 5483PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
Plaintiff being an employee of the United States became entitled to benefits under RSA ch. 282 solely by virtue of an agreement entered into, under authority of Title XV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C., ss. 1361-1369), between the Secretary of Labor of the United States and the New Hampshire Department of Employment Security (referred to therein as the Agency).
This agreement provides in parts as follows:
“ I. The Agency will act as agent of the United States for the purpose of making payments of compensation under title XV . . .
“ II. The Agency will pay compensation under title XV, to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Estrada v. AhrensCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Nash Miami Motors, Inc., and Sydney Ginsberg v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weaver v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- Anita Smith v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, Paul R. Ignatius, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Conrad v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Riesenberg v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Litchfield v. PfefferSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976