Strowenjans v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1ConcurrenceLagarde, Justice
I agree -with the majority that the judgment of the trial court must be reversed. However, because I conclude that appellant’s guilty plea was conditional, and thus, not knowingly and voluntarily entered, I disagree as to the reason for reversing. Consequently, I concur in the judgment only.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The State challenges this Court’s jurisdiction to review appellant’s point of error. Appellant filed a pretrial motion to suppress evidence “seized during the course of and as a result of an illegal detainment, seizure, search, and arrest of the Defendant....” Following a hearing, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.