Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Strowenjans v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1996No. 05-93-01583-CRPublished

1ConcurrenceLagarde, Justice

I agree -with the majority that the judgment of the trial court must be reversed. However, because I conclude that appellant’s guilty plea was conditional, and thus, not knowingly and voluntarily entered, I disagree as to the reason for reversing. Consequently, I concur in the judgment only.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The State challenges this Court’s jurisdiction to review appellant’s point of error. Appellant filed a pretrial motion to suppress evidence “seized during the course of and as a result of an illegal detainment, seizure, search, and arrest of the Defendant....” Following a hearing, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Lyon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API