Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Henderson
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Respondent James Henderson was awarded black lung benefits by an ALJ in 1987. Petitioner BethEnergy Mines, Inc., Henderson’s employer, sought modification of the award, contending that the ALJ had made “a mistake in a determination of fact” in initially awarding benefits to Henderson. Upon reconsideration, the ALJ found, based on new evidence proffered by BethEnergy, that it had been mistaken in a determination of fact. Nevertheless, the ALJ denied reopening because it held that reopening would not “render justice under the Act.” The Benefits Review Board affirmed. For the reasons that…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Mullins Coal Co. of Va. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Metropolitan Stevedore Co. v. RamboSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Banks v. Chicago Grain Trimmers Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- O'KEEFFE v. Aerojet-General Shipyards, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009