Legal Opinion
James Trickey v. Kaman Industrial Technologies
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 5, 2013No. 12-1061, 12-1177PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
A jury found in favor of James Trickey in his employment-discrimination suit under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA), § 213.010 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, against Kaman Industrial Technologies Corporation (“Kaman”). The jury awarded Trickey $160,000 for his age-discrimination claim; $100,000 for his retaliation claim; and $500,000 in punitive damages. The district court 1 awarded Triekey attorneys’ fees at the Cape Girar-deau, Missouri rate, which is less than the St. Louis, Missouri rate that Triekey requested. On appeal, Kaman argues that the district court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- William Knighton, Cross-Appellant v. John C. Watkins, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Calvin Kirklin v. Joshen Paper & Pkg of ArkansasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Manor Care Inc. v. Tom DouglasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- Ray Nassar v. Earnestine JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Jeannie May v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Tom Dunne, Jr. v. Resource Converting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.