Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Street Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This is a suit for injunction, brought by the San Antonio Street Railway Company, appellee, against the City of San Antonio and its engineer, A. P. Pancoast, appellants, and Wilding, Marshall, Bacus, and Hines, sewer contractors, who have not appealed, to restrain all defendants from constructing sewers in gnd along the centres of portions of certain streets in said city, whereon plaintiff is alleged to have double tracks over which its lines of railway are constructed and operated.

Plaintiff alleged in its petition that it was incorporated by an act of the Legislature…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Matter of Petition of DeeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Louisville City Railway Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  4. Perkins v. . GilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Kirby v. Citizens' Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1878

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. City of San Antonio v. Bexar Metropolitan Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Harris County Flood Control District v. Shell Pipe Line Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API