Legal Opinion

Odlin v. Woodruff

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1893PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Orange county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the-court.

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, J :

The fourteenth subdivision of Section 9, of Chapter 4010, laws, approved June 10th, 1891, provides as follows: “All dentists and lawyers, practicing their profession in the State of Florida, shall pay to the tax collector, in the counties where their office is located, a license tax of ten dollars.” The same section in express terms prohibits any person from engaging in any business or profession mentioned therein unless a State license shall have been procured from the tax collector, which license shall be issued to each person on the receipt of the amount therein provided; and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Baldwin v. TuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1877
  3. Young v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1879
  4. City of St. Louis v. SternbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hibernian Benevolent Society v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Fast v. Rogers, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Town of Orange City v. ThayerSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  4. H. W. Metcalf Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. Wildwood Crate & Ice Co. v. Citizens Bank of InvernessSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API