Legal Opinion

Steinman v. Baltimore Antiseptic Steam Laundry Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 4, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Baltimore City Court (Siiabp, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtPearce, J.

This is an action of tresspass vi et armis by the appellant against the appellee for an alleged assault and battery committed by an agent and servant of the defendant corporation in the regular course of his employment by the defendant. The defendant is a laundry company, duly incorporated.

The plaintiff, who is a married woman, to prove her case, produced only two witnesses. Her first witness was G. E. Saffran, who testified that he was route superintendent of defendant at the time of the alleged assault, and that he was required in the discharge of his duty to adjust disputes about the work…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDermott v. American Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  2. Dyk v. De YoungAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Evans v. MorsellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Nelson v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Symington v. SipesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Clark v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API