Legal Opinion

Tidwell v. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20627PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Plaintiff sues for damage to his automobile occasioned by a collision with one of the cars forming a part of a stationary train of freight-cars, which it is alleged blocked a public-road crossing for a period of time exceeding the limit allowed by a city ordinance. Petitioner alleges that he approached the crossing cautiously, at night, with the headlights on his automobile burning and in good condition, on a down grade and at a moderate rate of speed, not exceeding fifteen miles per hour, and that he was misled into thinking that the crossing was clear, by reason of the fact that the cars…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brinson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  3. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Lane v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mann v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Zickefoose v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Bledsoe ex rel. Bledsoe v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Evans v. Georgia Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Brown v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API