Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Ganger

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 11, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Justice.

The answer to the question of whether the city had the power to repair the streets in the manner described in the opinion by Mr. Justice Thomas and to assess a portion of the cost thereof against the abutting property owners is found in the clear and unequivocal language of Section 56 of the city charter.1 This legislative act provides “A Local Improvement is an improvement defined by this section and made under the provisions hereof.” It *118further describes the classes of improvements “authorized to be made under the provisions of this Act.” There are five classes of improvements…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosche v. City of HollywoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Summerland, Inc. v. City of Punta GordaSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Escott v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. McDonald v. FraleighSupreme Court of Florida · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Whitman v. City of North MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Abrams v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Armstrong v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  5. City of Miami v. LeeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API