Legal Opinion

Bruce v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 22, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from decree of circuit court of Nansemond county, rendered April 13th, 1888, in a cause wherein the John L. Roper Lumber Company was complainant, and B. M. Bruce was defendant. The decree perpetually enjoined the defendant from cutting and removing certain standing timber, to which the complainant company laid claim, and he appealed. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHinton, J.

This is a controversy between the appellant and appellee as to the right of the former to cut timber in that part of the Dismal Swamp -which, from its proximity to Suffolk, is known as the “Suffolk side” of the Swamp.

The appeal is taken from a decree of the circuit court of Nansemond county which perpetuates the injunction previously awarded, and allows the defendant, Bruce, “to remove from the lands in the bill and proceedings mentioned all the timber which he had cut thereon prior to the 14th day of August, 1886, that being the date on which he received notice from the Dismal Swamp Land…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barreda v. SilsbeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Akamine & Sons, Ltd. v. American Security BankHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. McComb v. McCombSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  3. Pacific Biscuit Co. v. DuggerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Harriss, Magill & Co. v. John H. Rodgers & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  5. Roselle v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API