Mattison v. Glenn
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gary, J., Anderson, December, 1920. Action by Pink Mattison against W. Keith Glenn. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. The decree of the Court below is as follows: This is a suit for accounting between the plaintiff and the defendant, W. Keith Glenn. The plaintiff claim's that as a share cropper the said defendant is still due him, practically all of the plaintiff’s share of the crop raised by him.
Read the full summary
Before Gary, J., Anderson, December, 1920. Action by Pink Mattison against W. Keith Glenn. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals. The decree of the Court below is as follows: This is a suit for accounting between the plaintiff and the defendant, W. Keith Glenn. The plaintiff claim's that as a share cropper the said defendant is still due him, practically all of the plaintiff’s share of the crop raised by him. The said defendant claims that he does not owe plaintiff anything. That the said defendant has furnished the plaintiff supplies to an amount greater than the plaintiff’s share of…
1Opinion of the Court
October 10, 1921. The opinion of the Court was delivered by In view of the conflicting and confused state of the testimony in this case, the Circuit Judge has arrived at the justice of it as nearly as we might hope to do, with these exceptions:(1) The defendant should account for the good cotton at 28 cents per pound and the off-grade at 25 cents per pound; the rule in the Rainwater Case, 114 S.C. 358,103 S.E. 587, does not justify charging him with more than the market value at the time settlement was demanded, with interest from that date, November 1, 1918; the interest to be calculated…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rainwater v. Merchants & Farmers BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Empire Mercantile Co. v. M. C. Kiser Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1920