Legal Opinion

Harry Stephens Farms, Inc. v. Wormald Americas, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2009No. 07-3547PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this environmental-contamination case, plaintiffs Harry Stephens (Stephens) and two affiliated farming businesses appeal the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment, holding that the applicable Arkansas three-year statute of limitations barred their action for damages, originally filed on June 9, 2006. Upon de novo review, see Bannister v. Bemis Co., 556 F.3d 882, 884 (8th Cir.2009), we reverse the grant of summary judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.

To begin, we agree with the district court’s application of the Arkansas three-year statute of limitations and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. Bannister v. Bemis Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  2. Chappell v. BUTTERFIELD-ODIN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 836District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  3. Smith v. Truman Road Development, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API