Legal Opinion
State v. Arthur
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 18, 1978No. 78-068PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issues in this criminal case involve the failure of the prosecution to timely comply with an order for discovery and the failure of the trial court to grant a mistrial. We uphold the conviction.
On January 4, 1977, a grand jury returned separate indictments against the defendant for two sales of a controlled drug. The Class A felonies were alleged to have occurred on February 12 and 24,1976. Before trial he filed a motion for discovery, seeking among other things the names of “all persons present at the alleged sale.” That part of the motion was granted on August 25,1977.
At the time of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Leonard Crow DogCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. ColbathSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. PrestonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- State v. GullickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. ScarlettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. DedrickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.