Legal Opinion

Parodis v. Hearn Department Stores, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

This is an application by the defendant Hearn Department Stores, Inc., for the examination before trial of the impleaded defendants Louis Rubin and Herbert Rubin upon the items set forth in- the notice, and that said impleaded defendants, upon such examination, produce their office records and divers other documents in connection with the examination sought. Notice of this application was given to the attorneys for said defendants, and they oppose the same upon the ground that there is no valid authority for an examination before trial by one codefendant against another where the codefendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Redfield v. National Petroleum Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Mackay, Lovell & Co. v. DillonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Roberts v. ThompsonNew York Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Kilgore Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
  2. Fenwick v. KapplerNew York Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API