Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of the Family Court, entered June 28, 1966, denying motion to vacate subpoena duces tecum unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and motion granted, without costs and without disbursements. In this action by a wife to enforce provisions for support, petitioner has served a subpoena duces tecum on the defendant husband’s mother. A similar subpoena to examine on the same subject matter *923and to produce the same documents had been served on the witness in a prior action for related relief in the Civil Court. The witness appeared in response to that subpoena and was examined fully.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christie's, Inc. v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Christie's, Inc. v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API