Legal Opinion

Olah v. Olah

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1984No. Docket 69107Published

1Opinion of the Court

135 Mich. App. 404 (1984)

354 N.W.2d 359

OLAH

v.

OLAH

Docket No. 69107.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided June 18, 1984.

Scholten, Fant & Marquis (by R. Neal Stanton), for plaintiff.

Diann J. Landers and Curtis R. Witte, for defendant.

Before: R.M. MAHER, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and J.G. ROSKOPP,[*] JJ.

R.B. BURNS, J.

This is a divorce action. At trial defendant sought a share of the value of the plaintiff's medical degree and her reasonable attorney fees and costs. The trial court denied both requests. Defendant appeals and we modify the judgment.

Plaintiff and defendant are 36 and 33 years old…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GrahamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Moss v. MossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Woodworth v. WoodworthMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. McLain v. McLainMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Westrate v. WestrateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API