Legal Opinion

Brooks v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas C. Chimera, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment in his action to recover the sum of $505.51 for unpaid salary, against defendant City of New York, and for judgment against defendant New York City Employees’ Retirement System declaring that said sum be included in ‘ ‘ earnable compensation ” as a basis for determination of petitioner’s pension payment. Defendants cite subdivision b of section 93c-2.0 of the Administrative Code and Quayle v. City of New York (278 N. Y. 19) for their refusal or unwillingness to pay the sum admittedly earned for the periods when the checks were not protested, and section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quayle v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Crowley v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Handel v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hessel v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Kleinfeldt v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Schacht v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API