Legal Opinion
State v. Rigsby
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 12, 1987No. 10449-7-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Schumacher, J. *
Clarence Rigsby appeals from a finding that he is a habitual criminal. We hold that the State failed to establish the constitutional validity of one of his prior convictions and reverse.
In March 1981, Clarence Rigsby was found guilty of two counts of first degree robbery (counts 1 and 4), two counts of second degree assault (counts 2 and 3), one count of first degree burglary (count 5), and one count of taking a motor vehicle without permission (count 6), all while armed with a deadly weapon. In April 1981, Rigsby was tried on a habitual criminal allegation, which was based on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. ZumwaltCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- State v. RigsbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987