Bond v. Dentzer
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES T. FOLEY, Chief Judge.
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER
The two lady plaintiffs for themselves and on behalf of alleged class members, similarly wronged it is claimed, seek injunctive and declaratory relief and the composition of a three-judge court. (28 U.S.C. §§ 2281-2284). The claims are always ones of serious nature in that they assert Article 3-A of the Personal Property Law, McKinney’s Consol. Laws, c. 41, and Article 9 of the Banking Law, McKinney’s Consol.Laws, c. 2, of New York State are unconstitutional on their face and as applied. Such laws are stated in the substantial complaint…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Madeline Johnson, Etc. v. The City of Opelousas, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Bond v. DentzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Page v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1971
- Serritella v. EngelmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
- Hooter v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.