Legal Opinion

Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1910Published

Action by Jacob J. Friedman against the James F. Scholes Company.

1Per curiam

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that at the time of the injury to plaintiff Kroger must be deemed to be the servant of the American Sugar Refining Company, and hot of defendant. Baldwin v. Abraham, 57 App. Div. 67, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1079, affirmed 171 N. Y. 677, 64 N. E. 1118; Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94, 67 N. Y. Supp. 1095, affirmed 171 N. Y. 507, 64 N. E. 172; Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation, 128 App. Div. 214, 112 N. Y. Supp. 566; McCarthy, v. McCabe, 131 App. Div. 396, 115 N. Y. Supp. 829; Muldoon v. City…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Kellogg v. Church Charity FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Howard v. . LudwigNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Howard v. LudwigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  5. Muldoon v. City Fireproofing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API