Legal Opinion
Joseph Triner Corporation v. Arundel
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 29, 1935No. 2836, 2839PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
Since the suits were brought to enjoin the enforcement of a state statute, the hearing was before a court consisting of three judges, as required by law.
The facts are not in dispute, and we find them to be, in substance, as follows :
Joseph Triner Corporation is and has been a corporation organized under the laws of Illinois. Its business is that of manufacturing and rectifying alcoholic liquors in its manufacturing plant at Chicago, 111. It has complied with the statutes of the state of Minnesota relative to foreign corporations doing business within that state, and it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Power Manufacturing Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Quaker City Cab Co. v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Kentucky Finance Corp. v. Paramount Auto Exchange Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
3Cited by19 opinions
- Granholm v. HealdSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- State Bd. of Equalization of Cal. v. Young's Market Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.