Legal Opinion

Dillard v. Strecker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1994No. 69,242PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, C.J.:

Lee Dillard, Sheila Dillard, and Lee Dillard as next friend of Joshua, Justin, Leah, William Jereme, and Brittani Dillard, minor children, (the Dillards) appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Kansas Court of Appeals, in 18 Kan. App. 2d 899, 861 P.2d 1372 (1993), affirmed the district court. This court granted the Dillards’ petition for review. We now affirm the district court and the Court of Appeals.

The facts and procedure in the trial court were…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Nowak v. NowakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Florida Power and Light Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1964

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Fleck v. ANG Coal Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McCubbin Ex Rel. McCubbin v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Thompson v. JessUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Beam v. Concord Hospitality, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API