Cooper v. State

Appellant raises two issues from the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. We affirm on the first issue without further *866discussion. In the second issue, appellant argues that his consecutive habitual offender sentences are barred under Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994). We reverse.

Appellant was convicted and adjudicated guilty of burglary of a structure (count one), grand theft (count two), resisting an officer without violence (count three), and carrying a concealed firearm…