Legal Opinion

Geary v. Martin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1931No. Appeal 14PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, P. J.,

The facts are stated in the opinion of the lower court as follows:

“The defendant had for a number of years been doing business under the fictitious name of Martin Construction and Supply Co., engaged in the dredging of coal in the Susquehanna River in the vicinity of Harrisburg and hired the claimant as a chauffeur and general utility man in connection with that business; that the defendant had a number of landings,...... near these landings or one of them the defendant company erected a building which contained a kitchen, dwelling room, several bedrooms and a sun…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matis v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. EwingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Taylor v. EWINGSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Zapos v. DemasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API