Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bank of Kaplan v. Richards

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1927Published

1ConcurrenceElliott, J.

It is not alleged nor shown that the present suit was authorized by a " board of directors as provided for by Act 267 of 1914, Sections 9 and 12. The amount due on his ’subscription by a stock subscriber is an asset of the corporation while the corporation is operating, and is -a going concern, but when it ceases to function and passes into the hands of a receiver, then the balance due by a stock subscriber on account of his subscription can be called in for' the purpose of paying creditors or for the purpose of an adjustment between the stockholders themselves, but not otherwise.

Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fourth Nat. Bank of NY v. FrancklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Evans v. NellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. State ex rel. McWilliams v. Atchafalaya-Teche-Vermilion Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API